Friday, May 22, 2020

The Fight That Will Never End Essay - 1720 Words

The Fight That Will Never End Abstract nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;In this paper I will be exploring and explaining the act of abortion. I will discuss the historical and analytical background by explaining pre Row versus Wade, and post Row versus Wade. I will be explaining this issue on a National level, and discuss how women’s role in society has changed dramatically since the famous trial. Introduction nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Abortion is the act of ending a pregnancy, either through surgery or by taking medication, with the intention not to have an infant born alive. Because many people believe that abortion should be legal under certain circumstances, it has been a topic of great debate and controversy throughout the nation.†¦show more content†¦Some believe that only the State- not the federal government – should regulate or outlaw abortion (Carlton 2000). nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;State laws prohibiting abortion began to appear in the 1820’s. By 1900 every state except Kentucky had made abortion a punished crime. By the 1960’s, pro-choice organizations in the United States had begun working to change state abortion laws. By the early 1970’s, fourteen states had laws permitting abortion if the women’s health was in danger, or if the woman was a victim of incest or rape. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;â€Å"In 1973 the Supreme Court of the United States delivered a historic decision on abortion in the case of Roe v. Wade (Carlton 2000).† The court ruled that states could not forbid a woman to have an abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy. â€Å"The court based this ruling on an assumption that an early abortion is usually safer for the mother than a pregnancy that lasts a full nine months.† The court also ruled that during the second trimester, states may regulate abortion only to protect a woman’s health. Once a fetus reaches the third trimester, states may regulate abortion to protect the interests of both women and the unborn (Author anonymous 2001). The Roe v. Wade decision stated that the U.S. constitution implies the right of privacy and allows a woman to decide for herself if she will have an abortion.Show MoreRelatedCreed, By Michael B. Jordan1161 Words   |  5 Pagesand he requested Balboa to become his mentor and trained him. In the process of becoming a professional fighter, Adonis went through challenges. Even though Adonis faces challenges in life, he overcomes them because he never gives up. In order to achieve our goal, we should never be afraid to take challenges. In the movie, Adonis does not want to use â€Å"Creed† this name because people will compare him with his father – Apollo Creed. He is so scared that he is not able to make it and it will disgraceRead MoreMy Modern Day Hero729 Words   |  3 Pagesstrength, courage and is willing to fight, my grandma is my modern day hero because she shows these traits and more. My grandma had a liver and kidney transplant last year, and she showed those heroic traits. She had strength both physically and mentally, she never complained and always kept fighting throughout her illness. My grandma had courage during this time because she overcame her obstacle without fear. She also showed the heroic trait willing to fight by never giving up. She always focused onRead MoreThe Theme Of 1984 By George Orwell842 Words   |  4 PagesThe citizens of Oceania are dehumanized and have no privacy under the Party’s control. Winston rebels against the Party to bring back the original past of mankind. It can be inferred that the theme of 1984 is to fight for what you believe in. The theme of 1984 by George Orwell is to fight for what you believe in. According to Orwell, â€Å"‘We believe that there is some kind of conspiracy, some kind of secret organization working against the Party, and that you are involved. We want to join it and workRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Romeo And Juliet1538 Words   |  7 Pageshimself so in love with Juliet, who he never met before till today. If Benvolio never convinces Romeo to go to the party, Romeo and Juliet would’ve never crossed paths with each other and they would still be alive at that time. Another mistake that affected Romeo and Juliet was the death of Tybalt and Mercutio. Mercutio is Romeo’s friend and he hates Tybalt. Tybalt is always starting trouble and he hates the Montagues. Mercutio and Tybalt end up getting in a fight that Romeo tries to stop, but insteadRead More Regeneration by Pat Barker Essay1716 Words   |  7 Pageswere encouraged to fight with honour and behave as gentlemen. These often resulted in more psychological torment. Men back home e.g. Yealland, the unsympathetic, practically abusive doctor clearly had no understanding at all of the soldiers experiences, tormenting those who did not want to go back, who had mental breakdown and suffered with extreme guilt complexes because of the enormous pressure they were under. It was difficult for women, for the men too old to fight and the boys to youngRead More The Effects of Modernity on Identity in Fight Club Essay1420 Words   |  6 Pages The Effects of Modernity on Identity in Fight Club Identity is a definition of the self, an explanation of character. However, in the movie Fight Club, the components that comprise outward identity often prove to be transitory. Edward Norton’s â€Å"Jack† character asks, â€Å"If you wake up at a different time, in a different place, could you wake up as a different person?† The effects of modernity lead to the impermanence of self image, and the decay of identity. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Rather thanRead MoreThe Capulets Downfall in William Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet1047 Words   |  4 Pagesprimarily responsible for the star-crossed lovers tragic end. In the play Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare tells a story about two star crossed lovers who try to stay together but every time things start to look good for Romeo and Juliet something horrible happens. The two families of Romeo and Juliet have quarreled for generations. When Romeo and Juliet meet at the Capulet’s party and learn the identity of each other, they knew that they could never be together. However, they go against their doubts andRead MoreThe Good Life Is Always Given At Birth963 Words   |  4 Pagescomparing the how the two fight for their freedom. Their struggles were never in vain. The sacrifice they had to do to achieve freedom, but they are not only fighting against social oppression for themselves but for others too. Freedom is something so basic us that sometimes we forget to realize how many lives had been sacrificed so that we get the opportunity all of us have right now. When reading â€Å"Long Hope to Freedom† by Nelson Mandala demonstrates a person who had the will to fight for the social injusticeRead MoreAnalysis Of Beowulf And The Three Battles 725 Words   |  3 Pagesconfidence high and went forward. People saw him as a hero for he never gave up. Beowulf proves his heroism through the defeat of Grendel, Grendel s mother, and the dragon. The fight with Grendel shows both Beowulf s power and strength. Although anyone who ever fought Grendel wore armor and used weapons, Beowulf showed bravery by using absolutely nothing. Ultimately, he was characterized as the strongest man ever during the fight and freely bragged about his strength. As stated in the text, TheRead MoreThe Thin Line Between Love And Hate Essay1435 Words   |  6 PagesBetween Love and Hate â€Å"Only the dead have seen the end of war.†- Plato. Plato was a philosopher in Classical Greece and the founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. War is nothing new, throughout history we have experienced over hundreds of wars with more in the future. For every war requires soldiers to fight for what they believe in. In most cases the soldiers are on a mission to fight the enemy for their country. Fighting is common between

Monday, May 18, 2020

Timeline from 1870 to 1880

1870 1870: Thomas Nast, the star political cartoonist of Harpers Weekly, began a campaign of lampoon the corrupt ring that secretly ran New York City. Nasts biting depictions of the Tweed Ring  helped bring down Boss Tweed.February 3, 1870: The 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which gave the right to vote to black males, became law when the required number of states ratified it.June 9, 1870: Charles Dickens, British novelist, died at the age of 58.July 15, 1870: Georgia became the last of the Confederate states to return to  the Union.July 19, 1870: The Franco-Prussian War began. The war was provoked by Otto von Bismarck, the Prussian leader, as part of his plan to unite Germany.October 12, 1870: Robert E. Lee, Confederate general in the Civil War, died at the age of 63 at Lexington, Virginia. 1871 January 1871: Italian troops led by Giuseppe Garibaldi briefly fought against Prussians in France during the Franco-Prussian War.March 26, 1871: The Paris Commune, a temporary government, formed after an uprising during the Franco-Prussian War, was proclaimed in Paris.May 28, 1871: The Paris Commune was suppressed as the French Army took over the city during what becomes known as The Bloody Week.Summer 1871: Photographer William Henry Jackson takes a number of photographs on the Yellowstone Expedition. The scenery he captured was so remarkable that it led to the creation of the National Parks.July 15, 1871: Thomas Tad Lincoln, the son of Abraham Lincoln, died in Chicago at the age of 18. He was buried beside his father in Springfield, Illinois.October 8, 1871: The Great Chicago Fire broke out. It destroyed much of the city of Chicago, and a persistent rumor was that it was caused by Mrs. OLearys cow.October 27, 1871: William M.  Boss Tweed, the leader of the legendary New York poli tical machine Tammany Hall, was arrested on multiple charges of corruption.November 10, 1871: The journalist and adventurer Henry Morton Stanley located David Livingstone in Africa, and said the famous greeting: Dr. Livingstone, I presume. 1872 January 6, 1872: Notorious Wall Street character Jim Fisk was fatally shot in a Manhattan hotel lobby. As he died, his partner Jay Gould and Boss Tweed stood vigil at his bedside. Legendary detective Thomas Byrnes apprehended Fisks assassin.March 1, 1872: Yellowstone National Park was established as the first National Park in the United States.April 2, 1872: Samuel F.B. Morse, American artist, and inventor of the telegraph and Morse Code, died at the age of 80 in New York City.Spring 1872: After supervising work on the Brooklyn Bridge in the caisson under the East River, Washington Roebling came to the surface too quickly and was stricken with the bends. He would be in poor health for years afterward.June 1, 1872: James Gordon Bennett, who in many ways invented the modern newspaper by founding the New York Herald, died in New York City.November 5, 1872: President Ulysses S. Grant wins a second term in the election of 1872, defeating legendary newspaper editor turned candidate Horace Greeley.November 29, 1872: Horace Greeley, who weeks earlier lost the presidential election, died in New York City. 1873 March 4, 1873: Ulysses S. Grant took the oath of office for the second time as he began his second term as President of the United States.April 1, 1873: The steamship Atlantic struck rocks on the coast of Canada, and at least 500 passengers and crew perished in one of the worst maritime disasters of the 19th century.May 4, 1873: David Livingstone, Scottish explorer of Africa, died in Africa of malaria at the age of 60.September 1873: A stock market crashed sets off the Panic of 1873, one of the great financial panics of the 19th century. 1874 January 17, 1874: Chang and Eng Bunker, conjoined twins who became famous as the Siamese Twins, died at the age of 62.March 11, 1874: Charles Sumner, Massachusetts senator who in 1856 had been beaten in the U.S. Capitol in an event leading up to the Civil War, died at the age of 63.March 8, 1874: Millard Fillmore, former president of the United States, died at the age of 74.November 1874: The Greenback Party was established in the United States. Its constituencies were the farmers and workers adversely affected by the Panic of 1873. 1875 April 21, 1875: Charles Stewart Parnell, Irish political leader, was elected to the British House of Commons.May 19, 1875: Mary Todd Lincoln, the widow of Abraham Lincoln, was judged to be insane in a trial instigated by her son, Robert Todd Lincoln.July 31, 1875: Andrew Johnson, who became president following the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, died at the age of 66. 1876 March 10, 1876: Alexander Graham Bell made the first successful telephone call, saying, Watson, come here, I need you.April 10, 1876: Alexander Turney Stewart, renowned New York City merchant, died.June 25, 1876: General George Armstrong Custer, commander of the 7th Cavalry, is killed, along with more than 200 of his men, at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.July 4, 1876: The United States celebrated its centennial with celebrations in cities and towns across the country.August 2, 1876: Wild Bill Hickok, gunfighter and lawman, was shot and killed while playing cards in Deadwood, Dakota Territory.August 25, 1876: The first crossing of the unfinished Brooklyn Bridge was accomplished by its master mechanic, E.F. Farrington, riding on a wire strung between its towers.November 7, 1876: The United States presidential election of 1876 was disputed and became the most controversial American election until the election of 2000. 1877 January 4, 1877: Cornelius Vanderbilt, known as The Commodore, died in New York City. He was by far the wealthiest person in the United States.Early 1877: An electoral commission was formed to settle the disputed presidential election of 1876 results in the Compromise of 1877. Rutherford B. Hayes was declared the winner of the election, and Reconstruction was effectively brought to an end.March 4, 1877: Rutherford B. Hayes was  inaugurated as president, and comes into office under a cloud of suspicion, being called His Fraudulency.May 1877: Sitting Bull led followers into Canada to escape the U.S. Army, and Crazy Horse surrendered to U.S. troops.June 21, 1877: Leaders of the Molly Maguires, a secret society of coal miners in Pennsylvania, were executed.July 16, 1877: A strike in West Virginia set off the Great Railroad Strike of 1877, which spread nationwide and spurred violent clashes in American cities.September 5, 1877: Crazy Horse was killed at an army base in Kansas. 1878 February 19, 1878: Thomas A. Edison patented the phonograph, which would rank as one of his most important inventions.April 12, 1878: William M.  Boss Tweed, the legendary head of Tammany Hall, died in jail in New York City at the age of 55.Summer 1878: The head of the Statue of Liberty was displayed in a park in Paris during an international exhibition.November 1878: The Second Anglo-Afghan War began when British troops began invading Afghanistan. 1879 April 30, 1879: Sarah J. Hale, a magazine editor who urged President Lincoln to make Thanksgiving an official holiday, died at the age of 90.August 21, 1879: Villagers at Knock, in rural Ireland, saw visions of the Virgin Mary, St. Joseph, and St. John the Evangelist. The village became a place of Catholic pilgrimage afterward.October 1879: In Ireland, following mass meetings held earlier in the year, the Land League  was  formed to organize tenant farmers.

Thursday, May 7, 2020

critical thinking - annotated bibliography - 1137 Words

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Abercrombie, S. (1990). A philosophy of interior design. New York; Harper Row. The rationalization of how interior design can be affected by the design thinking process is imperative to the comprehension of how interior design itself affects the psychological wellbeing of the end user. Abercrombie considers that conceptualization of the overall desired result is necessary as a starting point, rather than part by part. This human-centered umbrella approach is significant to design thinking as it encourages design to focus empathetically on the end user rather than as an afterthought. Taking Interior Design to another level (in business as well as in general) will involve the marriage of comprehensive†¦show more content†¦Eidson directs the research in a timeline context including significant events and aspects which further the critical thinking process. Poldma, T. (2009). Taking Up Space: Exploring the Design Process. New York; Fairchild Books. Poldma dissects the Interior Design one element at a time. Her book will assist with the research required of this paper by providing evidence of the measured process by which the Interior Design profession is founded. She carefully elevates both the pragmatics and philosophy required by Designers within the industry as we are often asked to offer both subjective and objective feedback simultaneously. She encourages the functional use of the programmed elements within a space rather than simply filling the environment with unjustified items, essentially what is added into a space should not just take up space but serve a purpose. This purpose(s), as will be argued in the author’s paper, can only be justified with the use of design thinking. Brown, T. (2009, July). Designers – think big! [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_brown_urges_designers_to_think_big.html Brown seems to be the forerunner of expertise on design thinking which makes the addition of his TedTalk into the research vital. It is Brown who defines design thinkingShow MoreRelatedAnnotated Bibliography On Critical Thinking1263 Words   |  6 PagesASSESSMENT 2: Annotated Bibliography Introduction This annotated bibliography has reviewed four journal articles or book chapters, three of which are related to a specific topic, and one related to critical thinking in business (see Reference list for full details of the source). The following paper contains annotations and a critical analysis of the published work. Annotations and Critical Analysis Professor Thomas K. Donaldson taught at Australian National University for years. In his articleRead MoreGen 499 General Education Capstone Entire Course980 Words   |  4 PagesResume and Cover Letter GEN 499 Week 2 Assignment Critiquing Internet Sources GEN 499 Week 3 DQ 1 Social Capital GEN 499 Week 3 DQ 2 Federal Policy GEN 499 Week 3 Assignment Annotated Bibliography GEN 499 Week 4 DQ 1 Call to Action GEN 499 Week 4 DQ 2 Final Research Paper Progress GEN 499 Week 4 Critical Thinking Quiz GEN 499 Week 5 DQ 1 Technology and Globalization GEN 499 Week 5 DQ 2 Reflecting on General Education GEN 499 Week 5 Assignment Final Research Paper GEN 499 General EducationRead MoreAnnotated Bibliography On Teaching And Teaching846 Words   |  4 PagesPaper-Annotated Bibliography Brittani Thomas Liberty University: EDUC 500 September 22, 2015 Customized Learning Theory Paper-Annotated Bibliography Hudgins, B.B., Riesenmy, M.R. (1994). Teaching self-direction to enhance children’s thinking in physical science. Journal of Educational Research, 88(1), 15. This article focused on the constant debate concerning the conditions in which students develop the skill of thinking critically. Being able to use critical thinking requiresRead MoreI Am A Foreign, Learning A Language, And An Argumentative Essay988 Words   |  4 PagesThe second reason is that it will help me improve my writing skills that i will need throughout my college years and the future. Throughout the semester, I have written a plethora of essays such as a rhetorical analysis, comparative review, annotated bibliography, exploratory, and an argumentative essay. Since it is my first time writing these types of essays, I struggled at first trying to figure out how to start the essays; however, our professor assisted us and showed us sample essays that helpRead MoreCritical Thinking And Critical Writing Essay1759 Words   |  8 Pagesclasses that I have taken so far in my academic career. There were many elements of the pre-writing process introduced during the past sixteen weeks, such as writing a preliminary draft and annotated bibliography, that I have never been exposed to before. The critical reading, critical thinking, and critical writing process in this course definitely stretched me as a writer and student. There were three writing styles practiced during this course along with three different genres. The first paperRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Reflection1032 Words   |  5 Pagessupport my ideas or beliefs. Even though this can be time consuming it is well worth it to have a lot of support and evidence to back my ideas or beliefs on a topic. Throughout this semester I have more of a general knowledge on rhetorical goals, critical reading and writing skills, my processes on how to write a paper, and learning a new way of creating an idea through electronical environments. Each assignment was different in the manner of finding appropriate information to compose ideas andRead MoreThe Museum Of The Civil Rights Movement873 Words   |  4 Pages The final exhibit in the museum of the Civil Rights Movement involves all levels of the critical thinking process as laid out by Reichenbach (2001). The six main parts of critical thinking also link to the Bloom’s Taxonomy levels, thus move students from review of knowledge all the way through the evaluation process. Students will use multiple different activities and teacher chosen groups in order to move seamlessly through the learning process (Carr Bertrando, 2012). The learning unit will endRead MoreAssignment : Evidence Based Practice, Research, And Quality Improvement1431 Words   |  6 Pagesfeasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness, and effectiveness. Evidence-Based Practice, Research, and Quality Improvement Processes These elements are foundational to the Magnet Recognition Program of the American Nurses Credentialing Center and are critical for attainment of the designation (Melnyk Fineout-Overholt, 2011, p. 10). These terms are inter-related in function, but have been clearly differentiated in an article by Brian Conner, PhD, RN, CNE (Connor, 2014). Connor defined research as a toolRead MoreBibliography Of An Annotated Bibliography1512 Words   |  7 PagesThe purpose of this paper is to display my knowledge of constructing an annotated bibliography. This annotated bibliography consists of the five articles from journal set A. The annotation covers evidence based practices and issues with the field of psychology such as lack of services, cost and, quality of care. Each annotation addresses the strength of the article, the purpose of the article, the relevance to the field of psychology and its uniqueness. The paper is a very brief synopsis of the articleRead MoreCritical Reading And Writing Of The Discipline864 Words   |  4 Pages Critical Reading and Writing in the Discipline (FOUN1019) is a yearlong course designed to improve and develop students’ cognitive, analytical and rhetorical skills. It thereby provides students with the requisite skills to truly join the scholarly arena and become academic writers. I enrolled in the FOUN1019 course with the assumption that I would become more proficient in English Language and a more eloquent communicator. I anticipated that the course would be challenging like many other

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Innovation, Entrepreneurship, And Innovation - 1559 Words

Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Intrapreneurship 2 INTRODUCTION Innovation, entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship is bringing your vision, creativity to life while building something of value that customers are willing to pay for. Bill Aulet, managing director in the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship at MIT, lectures on IDEs â€Å"innovation-driven enterprises†, high growth potential and competitive advantage that brings new innovations to customers’ world-wide. (Aulet, 2013). Tom Peters teaches the benefits of SMEs â€Å"small and medium enterprises† (SME), you don’t have to be in a traditional competitive market, just well understood business ideas, which have a possibility of failure (Peters, Building a Culture of Innovation, 1999). Entrepreneur is a chance, to start your own business, with the possibility of failure. Intrapreneurship is given the financial support of a corporation or large company to have the freedom of innovation, be creative at no cost. ----------- Keywords: Business, Creative, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Intrapreneurship Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Intrapreneurship 3 Risks and Benefits of Enterprises Risks: †¢ Small Medium Enterprises â€Å"SMEs† is business or organization that usually starts in a home or small office, set of clients, depending on annual sales and funded by bank loans orShow MoreRelatedEntrepreneurship and Innovation710 Words   |  3 Pagesempirical study and cannot be validated by research evidence. The misconceptions about entrepreneurship has been promulgated and perpetuated by media (Hunter, 2012, p. 90). The thought of innovation conjures up images of something breath-taking, novelty par excellence, invention of the century and solutions to mysteries. Therefore, innovative events are isolated events. Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Innovation Dyer, Gregersen Christensen (2009, p. 66) found that nurture rather than natureRead MoreEntrepreneurship and Innovation2384 Words   |  10 PagesEntrepreneurs innovate. Innovation is the specific instrument of entrepreneurship. The act that endows resources with a new capacity to create wealth.  © Peter Drucker. Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower.  © Steve Jobs, Apple. As time goes on, nothing remains the same in our world. Seasons, weather, relationships, human emotions, everything is affected by time- everything keeps changing. The same thing is in market industry. The progress is unstoppable andRead MoreEntrepreneurship and Innovation3186 Words   |  13 PagesEntrepreneurship and Innovation Abstract The following pages focus on analyzing the blood donation helpline developed in India through some of the theories learning in this course. The most important theories that can be applied in this case are represented by the opportunity recognition theory, the social and frugal entrepreneurship theory, and the technological change and entrepreneurial opportunities theory. The Introduction presents the points of view addressed in this paper. The SituationRead MoreRole of Entrepreneurship and Innovation2686 Words   |  11 Pagesâ€Å"They have employed existing means of production differently, more appropriately, more adventurously. They have â€Å"carried out new combinations†. They are entrepreneurs† – Joseph Schumpeter (Lumsdaine and Binks, 2007). Entrepreneurship is a procedure through which individuals identify opportunities (problems that need to be solved or unmet needs) in the market place, allocate resources, initiate change by being innovative and creat ive and create value through solutions. One of the Factors of ProductionRead MoreEntrepreneurship and Innovation Management9362 Words   |  38 PagesEntrepreneurship  and  Innovation  Management  Master’s  Thesis   Serkan Ceylan                      Entrepreneurship  and  Innovation  Management Master’s  Thesis Serkan  Ceylan      ABSTRACT   The purpose of this study is to analyse the problem that the companies do not use the potential of their employees on innovations and intrapreneurial processes. The source of innovation is usually the entrepreneur. These are individuals that come up with new ideasRead MoreRelationship of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Creativity1993 Words   |  8 Pagesdeveloping countries, are taking measures to inspire entrepreneurship and innovation with purposes of benefiting economic development from these competitive advantages (Stoneman, 1995; Zhao, 2001). It is universally held that entrepreneurship and innovation are complementary and their combination can efficiently contribute to economy performance (Grupp, 2001; Stoneman, 1995). During the transfer from idea creation to eventually economy development, innovation is supposed to be a necessary condition, butRead MoreThe Theory Of Organizational Innovation And Entrepreneurship942 Words   |  4 PagesAlthough there are many ideas surrou nding the theory of organizational innovation and entrepreneurship, I will highlight only a few here in this assignment. To start off, an entrepreneur is a person who organizes and operates a business, taking on greater than normal financial risks in order to do so. An entrepreneurial organization is any organization that is structured so that staff are given the information and tools necessary to allow them to pursue solutions and take advantage of opportunitiesRead MoreSocial Entrepreneurship And Social Innovation1502 Words   |  7 PagesSocial Entrepreneurship The term â€Å"social entrepreneurship† first appeared in the scholarly literature over 35 years ago in a publication titled The Sociology of Social Movements (Banks,1972). However, Social entrepreneurship has its origins in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries when philanthropic business owners and industrialists like Robert Owen, demonstrated a concern for the welfare of employees by improving their working, schooling and cultural lives. Since then, social entrepreneurshipRead MoreThe Nature And Importance Of Innovation Entrepreneurship3458 Words   |  14 PagesIn entrepreneurship development to compete swiftly in the modern and industrial generation we are in now, there must be changes that the entrepreneurs must keep on administering in their businesses and skills to remain relevant in the competitions. The changes can be summed up as innovation in the entrepreneurship area, and are fast moving that every entrepreneur must be very flexible to keep on track at every po int of changes, either locally or globally (Acs, Audretsch, 2005). Most of the significantRead MoreCreativity And Innovation As The Driving Power Of Entrepreneurship1610 Words   |  7 Pagescompany but to investigate new approaches to management that allow find, build or seize opportunities to survive and progress (Hamidi, Wennberg Berglund, 2008). The aim of this research will be to analyse how creativity and innovation as the driving power of entrepreneurship. Usually when you think that creativity is associated with the artistic and / or scientific, and even when this concept leads organizations usually is the heritage of communications in general and advertising in particular,

Managing Organisational Change Free Essays

string(56) " have been and are being put out to private tender \(e\." International Journal of Public Sector Management Emerald Article: Managing organisational change in the public sector Lessons from the privatisation of the Property Service Agency Ron Coram, Bernard Burnes Article information: To cite this document: Ron Coram, Bernard Burnes, (2001),†Managing organisational change in the public sector – Lessons from the privatisation of the Property Service Agency†, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 14 Iss: 2 pp. 94 – 110 Permanent link to this document: http://dx. We will write a custom essay sample on Managing Organisational Change or any similar topic only for you Order Now doi. org/10. 108/09513550110387381 Downloaded on: 17-01-2013 References: This document contains references to 56 other documents Citations: This document has been cited by 14 other documents To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight. com This document has been downloaded 4884 times since 2005. * Users who downloaded this Article also downloaded: * Ron Coram, Bernard Burnes, (2001),†Managing organisational change in the public sector – Lessons from the privatisation of the Property Service Agency†, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 4 Iss: 2 pp. 94 – 110 http://dx. doi. org/10. 1108/09513550110387381 Ron Coram, Bernard Burnes, (2001),†Managing organisational change in the public sector – Lessons from the privatisation of the Property Service Agency†, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 14 Iss: 2 pp. 94 – 110 http://dx. doi. org/10. 1108/09513550110387381 Ron Coram, Bernard Burnes, (20 01),†Managing organisational change in the public sector – Lessons from the privatisation of the Property Service Agency†, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 4 Iss: 2 pp. 94 – 110 http://dx. doi. org/10. 1108/09513550110387381 Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by Edinburgh Napier University For Authors: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service. Information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www. emeraldinsight. com/authors for more information. About Emerald www. emeraldinsight. om With over forty years’ experience, Emerald Group Publishing is a leading independent publisher of global research with impact in business, society, public policy and education. In total, Emerald publishes over 275 journals and more than 130 book series, as well as an extensive range of online products and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 3 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. *Related content and download information correct at time of download. The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at http://www. emerald-library. com/ft IJPSM 14,2 94 Lessons from the privatisation of the Property Service Agency Manchester School of Management, UMIST, Manchester, UK Keywords Organizational change, Public sector management, Privatization, Government agencies, Public authority assets Abstract Whilst organisational change appears to be happening with increasing frequency and magnitude in both the public and private sectors, most of the major studies of change focus on the private sector and tend to derive their approaches to change from that sector. From a review of the literature, it is argued that there is no â€Å"one best way† to manage organisational change but that public sector organisations need to adopt an approach to change which matches their needs and situation. The article examines the privatisation of the Property Services Agency (PSA) in order to draw lessons as to how the public sector can and should manage change. It is shown that the privatisation was characterised by a lack of clarity, an over-emphasis on changes to structures and procedures, and staff resistance. However, underpinning this was an inappropriate approach to change. The article concludes that the main lessons of the PSA’s privatisation are that, in such circumstances, it is necessary to adopt an approach to change which incorporates both the structural and cultural aspects of change, and which recognises the need to appreciate and respond to staff fears and concerns. Managing organisational change in the public sector Ron Coram and Bernard Burnes The International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 14 No. 2, 2001, pp. 94-110. MCB University Press, 0951-3558 Introduction From Kurt Lewin’s work in the 1940s to the present day, organisational change, as a systematic process, has moved from being a topic of interest to only a few academics and practitioners to one that is seen as lying at the core of organisational life (Senior, 1997; Stickland, 1998). However, whilst organisational change appears to be happening with increasing frequency and magnitude in both t he public and private sectors, most of the major studies of and approaches to change  ± with some notable exceptions (e. g. Pettigrew et al. , 1992)  ± focus on the private sector and tend to derive their approaches to change from that sector (e. g. Kanter et al. , 1992; Kotter, 1996; Mabey and Mayon-White, 1993; Pettigrew, 1985; Smith, 1997). Not only does this underplay the enormous changes which have taken place and are continuing to take place in the public sector, but it also ignores the need to develop approaches to change which are in tune with the circumstances in which public service organisations now find themselves (Flynn and Williams, 1997; Salauroo and Burnes, 1998). Though there have been some well-publicised examples of public sector change projects which have gone badly wrong (Brindle, 1999), there is no evidence to show that public sector managers are, inherently, any less capable of managing change than their private sector counterparts (Ferlie et al. , 1996). However, the challenges they face are different from those of their private sector counterparts, especially in terms of public accountability, demonstrating value for money, and in meeting the increasing expectations, regarding service levels and quality, of both the general public and politicians. Over the last 20 years, one of the most significant challenges that public sector managers have had to cope with, and one which has taken them into unknown territory, has been that the boundary between the public and private sector has become increasingly hazy (Crouch and Streeck, 1997; Flynn, 1993). In the UK, which has tended to be at the forefront of these developments, some public services, or parts of them, have been and are being put out to private tender (e. You read "Managing Organisational Change" in category "Papers" g. he management of some schools and local education authorities); in other cases, public bodies have been turned into quasi-independent organisations (e. g. the Benefits Agency); and, in other instances, some organisations have been and are being privatised in their entirety (e. g. public utilities). All these forms of organisational change throw up their own dilemmas and challenges, and they all require an approach to change which is appropriate to the circum stances involved. However, as Dunphy and Stace (1993) argued, there is no one approach which is suitable for all circumstances and objectives. This article examines one particular and major form of organisational change which continues to have a large impact on the public sector: privatisation. It focuses upon the Property Services Agency (PSA) which, until its privatisation in the early 1990s, was responsible for the construction, maintenance and management of all the UK government’s buildings and property. By presenting a case study of the privatisation of the PSA, the article seeks to draws lessons as to how the public sector can and should manage change. The article begins by reviewing the literature on change management. In particular, it draws attention to the need to recognise that there is no â€Å"one best way† to manage organisational change. This is followed by a description of the background to our research on the PSA, and the presentation of the case study itself. As the subsequent discussion section shows, the privatisation of the PSA was characterised by a lack of clarity, an over-emphasis on changes to structures and procedures, and staff resistance. Underpinning this was an inappropriate approach to change. In conclusion, the article argues that the main lessons of the PSA’s privatisation are that, in such circumstances, there is a need to adopt an approach to change which balances the structural and cultural aspects of change, especially the need to appreciate and respond to staff fears and concerns. Approaches to change management As Stickland (1998, p. 14) remarks: F F Fthe problem with studying change is that it parades across many subject domains under umerous guises, such as transformation, development, metamorphosis, transmutation, evolution, regeneration, innovation, revolution and transition to name but a few. Organisational change in the public sector 95 IJPSM 14,2 96 Especially over the last 20 years or so, as the pace and magnitude of organisational change appears to have accelerated, there has been a significant increase in the number of approaches to change management on offer (see Buchanan and Boddy, 1992; Buchanan and Storey, 1997; Burnes, 2000; Cummings and Worley, 1997; Dawson, 1994; Kanter et al. 1992; Pettigrew et al. , 1992; Senior, 1997; Stace and Dunphy, 1994; Stickland, 1998; Wilson, 1992). Nevertheless, most writers tend to fall into one of two broad camps: those who support the Planned approach to change and those who espouse the Emergent approach. The Planned approach originated in the 1940s from the work of Kurt Lewin (Lewin, 1947). Subsequently, it was adopted by, and became the central focus of, the Organization Development (OD) movement (French and Bell, 1995). However, in the 1980s, as a result of increasing criticism of the Planned approach, the Emergent approach to change came to the fore. Its proponents argued that the Emergent approach was more suitable for the dynamic and unpredictable conditions faced by organisations in the late twentieth century. The following briefly examines, and attempts to put into perspective, both these approaches to change in order to prepare the ground for presenting and discussing the privatisation of the PSA. Planned change: summary and criticisms Planned change is an iterative, cyclical, process involving diagnosis, action and evaluation, and further action and evaluation. It is an approach which maintains that once change has taken place, it must be self-sustaining (i. e. safe from regression). The purpose of Planned change is to improve the effectiveness of the human side of the organisation by focusing on the performance of groups and teams. Central to Planned change is the stress placed on the collaborative nature of the hange effort: the organisation, managers, recipients of change and change agents jointly diagnose the organisation’s problem and jointly plan and design the specific changes. Underpinning Planned change, and indeed the origins of the OD movement as a whole, is a strong humanist and democratic orientation and an emphasis on improving organisational effectiveness. The main criticisms levelled against the Planned approach to change are, as Burnes and Salauroo (19 95) point out, as follows. First, Planned change was developed specifically for, and in response to, topdown, autocratic, rigid, rule-based organisations operating in a somewhat predictable and controlled environment. However, an increasing number of writers argue that, in the turbulent and chaotic world in which we live, such assumptions are increasingly tenuous and that organisational change is more a continuous and open-ended process than a set of discrete and self-contained events (Garvin, 1993; Hatch, 1997; Nonaka, 1988; Peters, 1989; Stacey, 1993; Wooten and White, 1999). Second, and on a similar note, a number of writers have criticised the Planned approach for its emphasis on incremental and isolated change, and its inability to incorporate radical, transformational change (Dunphy and Stace, 1993; Harris, 1985; Miller and Friesen, 1984; Schein, 1985). Third, Planned change is based on the assumption that common agreement can be reached, and that all the parties involved in a particular change project have a willingness and interest in doing so. This assumption appears to ignore organisational conflict and politics, or at least assumes that problem issues can be easily identified and resolved. However, as Pfeffer (1981; 1992) showed, conflict and personal and group self-interest do play an important role in what changes take place and who benefits from them. Fourth, it assumes that one type of approach to change is suitable for all organisations, all situations and all times. Dunphy and Stace (1993, p. 905), on the other hand, argue that: Turbulent times demand different responses in varied circumstances. So managers and consultants need a model of change that is essentially a â€Å"situational† or â€Å"contingency model†, one that indicates how to vary change strategies to achieve â€Å"optimum fit† with the changing environment. Organisational change in the public sector 97 Leading OD advocates, as might be expected, dispute these criticisms and point to the way that Planned change has tried to incorporate issues such as power and politics and the need for organisational transformation (Cummings and Worley, 1997; French and Bell, 1995). Nevertheless, as criticisms of the Planned approach mounted, supporters of the Emergent approach gained ground. Emergent change: summary and criticisms There are many writers who have contributed to the development of the Emergent approach, notably Dawson (1994), Kanter et al. (1992), Kotter (1996), Pettigrew (1985) and Wilson (1992). Unlike the supporters of the Planned approach, the main proponents of the Emergent approach are a much more diverse group who are separated by both geographic and disciplinary divides. Nevertheless, they would, more or less, agree that the main tenets of Emergent change are as follows: . Organisational change is a continuous process of experiment and adaptation aimed at matching an organisation’s capabilities to the needs and dictates of a dynamic and uncertain environment. . Though this is best achieved through a multitude of (mainly) small- to medium-scale incremental changes, over time these can lead to a major re-configuration and transformation of an organisation. . Change is a multi-level, cross-organisation process that unfolds in an iterative and messy fashion over a period of years and comprises a series of interlocking projects. . Change is a political-social process and not an analytical-rational one. The role of managers is not to plan or implement change per se, but to create or foster an organisational structure and climate which encourages and sustains experimentation, learning and risk-taking, and IJPSM 14,2 . 98 . to develop a workforce that will take responsibility for identifying the need for change and implementing it. Although managers are expected to become facilitators rather than doers, they also have the prime responsibility for developing a collective vision or common purpose which gives direction to their organisation, and within which the appropriateness of any proposed change can be judged. The key organisational activities which allow these elements to operate successfully are: information-gathering  ± about the external environment and internal objectives and capabilities; communication  ± the transmission, analysis and discussion of information; and learning  ± the ability to develop new skills, identify appropriate responses and draw knowledge from their own and others’ past and present actions. Though not always stated explicitly, the case for an Emergent approach to change is based on the assumption that all organisations operate in a turbulent, dynamic and unpredictable environment. Therefore, if the external world is changing in a rapid and uncertain way, organisations need to be continuously scanning their environment in order to identify developments and respond appropriately. Though ultimately leading to organisational transformation, to be successful, it is argued, change needs to emerge locally and incrementally in order to respond to threats and opportunities thrown up by environmental instability. Because this is a continuous, open-ended and bottom-up process, the Planned approach to change is inappropriate. This leads to the first of three major criticisms of the Emergent approach: it is specifically founded on the assumption that all organisations operate in a dynamic environment which requires continuous transformation. It is, by its own definition, not applicable to organisations operating in stable environments where fine-tuning is the order of the day, or those whose circumstances require major changes through the use of rapid and coercive measures. The second criticism relates to the difference between these two approaches. The Planned approach is attacked because of its advocacy of â€Å"Refreezing† organisations after they have been changed (Kanter et al. , 1992). However, if one examines the process of change advocated by, for example, Dawson (1994), Kotter (1996) and Pettigrew et al. (1992), though they argue to the contrary, they do speak of change as a â€Å"transition† process which does have a beginning, middle and end. Indeed, as Hendry (1996, p. 24) comments: Scratch any account of creating and managing change and the idea that change is a threestage process which necessarily begins with a process of unfreezing will not be far below the surface. The final criticism concerns the emphasis that advocates of the Emergent approach place on the political and cultural aspects of change. Though undoubtedly politics and culture do play a role in the change process, a number of writers have begun to criticise what they regard as the overemphasis placed on these aspects of change. Hendry (1996, p. 21), for example, argues that: â€Å"The management of change has become F F F overfocused on the political aspects of change†, whilst Collins (1998, p. 100), voicing concerns of his own and of other researchers, argues that: F F F in reacting to the problems and critiques of [the Planned approach], managers and practitioners have swung from a dependence on under-socialized models and explanations of change and instead have become committed to the arguments of, what might be called, oversocialized models of change. Organisational change in the public sector 99 Therefore, though it has apparent advantages over the Planned approach, or rather it is applicable to situations for which Planned change is not suitable, an examination of the Emergent approach reveals that it not free from serious criticism. Putting change into perspective In examining the Planned and Emergent approaches to change, what we can see is that they focus on different aspects of organisations and are applicable to different situations. The Planned approach is primarily aimed at improving group effectiveness, tends to have a top-down orientation and is most suitable for stable environments. The Emergent approach, on the other hand, tends to focus on organisational transformation through continuous change and seems more suited to turbulent environments. This means that, despite their other strengths and weaknesses, both are essentially situational approaches: suitable only for particular situations. In addition, it is also clear that, even taken together, the two approaches do not cover all the broad spectrum of change events which organisations encounter. Senior (1997), for example, rawing on the work of Grundy (1993), identifies three categories of change: â€Å"smooth incremental†  ± covering slow, systematic, evolutionary change; â€Å"bumpy incremental†  ± pertaining to periods where the smooth flow of change accelerates; and â€Å"discontinuous change†. Cummings and Worley (1997) identify a continuum running from incremental change to quantum change. Dunphy and Stace (1992), in a similar but more detailed way, identify a four-stage change c ontinuum that comprises: fine-tuning, incremental adjustment, modular transformation and corporate transformation. Storey (1992) offers a four-fold typology of change: (1) Top-down systemic change. This is aimed at transforming the organisation. (2) Piecemeal initiatives. These are devised and implemented by departments or sections in an unconnected fashion. (3) Bargaining for change. This is where a series of targets are jointly agreed between managers and workers, but are pursued in a piecemeal fashion. (4) Systemic jointism. This is where managers and workers agree a total package of changes designed to achieve organisational transformation. IJPSM 14,2 100 Kanter et al. (1992), addressing the issue of transformational change, have noted that it can be achieved either by a Bold Stroke approach (rapid overall change) or a Long March approach (incremental change leading to transformation over an extended period of time). In a similar vein, Beer and Nohria (2000) make an interesting contribution to the change debate. Based on over 40 years of studying the nature of corporate change, they identify two basic archetypes, or theories of change: Theory E and Theory O. The main objective of Theory E change is to maximise shareholder value. It is applied in situations where an organisation’s performance has diminished to such an extent that its main shareholders demand major and rapid change to improve the organisation’s financial performance. Typically this is a â€Å"hard† approach based on downsizing, divestment of non-core or low-performing businesses, and the heavy use of financial incentives. Theory O, on the other hand, is also aimed at improving an organisation’s performance but his is more a â€Å"soft† approach which is based on developing the organisation’s culture and its human capabilities, and promoting organisational learning. Beer and Nohria (2000) believe that both of these are valid models of change but that both have their flaws. Theory E can achieve short-term financial gains but at the cost of denuding an organisation of the human capabilities and organisational culture necessary for lon g-term survival. Theory O, whilst focusing on these, falls into the trap of not restructuring to concentrate on core activities, thus failing to deliver shareholder value. To achieve the gains of both these approaches, whilst avoiding the pitfalls, Beer and Nohria advocate using these in tandem by focusing on the rapid restructuring elements of Theory E but following this with the human capability development offered by Theory O. Although similar to Kanter et al. ‘s (1992) â€Å"Bold Strokes† and â€Å"Long March†, this idea goes beyond most other writers by pointing out that it is possible and sometimes necessary to combine approaches to change, rather than arguing for some sort of universal approach. In concluding this review of the literature on organisational change, three issues need to be emphasised, which are as follows: (1) There are a wide variety of approaches to change, though some tend to be more popular than others. (2) As Burnes (1996) argues, there is no â€Å"one best way† to manage change. All the approaches on offer appear to be situational, i. e. limited in terms of the circumstances in which they are effective. Therefore, managers need to choose an approach which is suitable for their situation rather than assuming that what worked in the past will also work in the future. 3) In some situations, it may be necessary to combine, either concurrently or sequentially, different approaches to change. Having identified the main issues with regard to the literature on change, we can now proceed to examine how the PSA managed change in practice. This will commence with a brief description of the background to our research, and the methods employed. Background and methods This article is based on research carried out between 1995 and 1998 by the authors into the process and consequences of the privatisation of the Property Services Agency. The research had two main objectives: (1) To identify the reasons for, and the process of, the privatisation of the PSA. (2) Post-privatisation, to examine the impact of the new arrangements on relations between government departments and the newly-privatised PSA. As mentioned in the Introduction, this article is concerned with the first objective, the process of privatisation. For a review of the impact of privatisation on relations between government departments and the privatised PSA, see Burnes and Coram (1999). Looking at the design of the research and the methods used to study the changes at the PSA, the aim of the research was to construct a mainly qualitative case study of what took place. This was based on principles and methods of research advocated by writers such as Denzin and Lincoln (1998), Robson (1993) and Yin (1994). Though documentary evidence was collected, such as press reports, extracts from parliamentary debates, internal PSA documents and the National Audit Office reports into the sale of the PSA (NAO, 1995; 1996), the main source of data came from interviews with those most closely involved with the process. These fell into five groups: (1) Senior civil servants within the responsible for managing and privatising the PSA. (2) Senior civil servants responsible for managing and procuring property and property services for government departments. (3) Senior civil servants in the bodies responsible for advising departments on purchasing policy. (4) Directors and operational staff in the privatised companies, the majority of whom were former PSA employees. (5) The Civil Service trade unions involved in the privatisation negotiations. In total, some 50 individuals were interviewed. The interviews were taperecorded and transcripts sent to the interviewees for checking and correction. In addition, a draft of the final report of the research was sent to the interviewees for comment. These data formed the basis of the following description of the privatisation process. Organisational change in the public sector 101 IJPSM 14,2 102 The privatisation of the Property Services Agency (PSA) Background The origins of the PSA can be traced to 1962 when the Ministry of Public Buildings and Works was made responsible for maintaining all the UK government’s civil buildings. A year later, the Ministry was merged with the Works Directorates of the Admiralty, War Office and Air Ministry. The merger increased the Ministry’s workforce to over 60,000. With the creation of the Department of the Environment (DoE) in 1970, it was decided that the responsibility for construction and maintenance services should become the responsibility of a separate agency and thus the Property Services Agency was born. Its role was to: F F F provide, manage, maintain, and furnish the property used by the government, including defence establishments, offices, courts, research laboratories, training centres and land (PSA, 1988, inside cover). In the 1960s and 1970s, few questioned whether or not such activities were best carried out by the public sector, but in the 1980s the tide of opinion began to turn (Crouch and Streeck, 1997). Claims of bureaucratic inefficiency and waste in the UK public services were nothing new (Chapman, 1978; Fulton, 1968; Plowden, 1961). However, what was new, with the election of Margaret Thatcher as Prime Minister in 1979, was that tackling â€Å"bloated, wasteful, overbureaucratic, and underperforming† public services became the centrepiece of government policy (Ferlie et al. , 1996, p. 11). Subsequently, successive Conservative governments attempted to deliver better value for money in public services through measures such as privatisation, outsourcing and compulsory competitive tendering (Flynn, 1993; Horton, 1996). Not surprisingly, given its size and importance, but most of all given the fact that it seemed to be carrying out a role that in other sectors of the economy was carried out by the private sector, the PSA became a prime target for reform. The process of privatisation In retrospect, it is possible to see that the process of privatising the PSA went through six key stages and began well in advance of the actual announcement that it was to be privatised: . Stage 1. In order to increase the commercial efficiency of the PSA, in 1986 the government appointed the consultancy firm Deloitte to develop and introduce new accounting and management information systems. These new systems were designed to allow the PSA to operate along private sector lines and to abandon public sector practices which were seen as uncommercial. . Stage 2. In 1987, it was announced that, from April 1988, civilian departments of government could take responsibility for commissioning their own construction projects with a value of over ? 150,000. The Ministry of Defence was allowed to follow suit in April 1990. In effect, . . . . this meant that the PSA was going to have to bid alongside private sector companies for government work. Stage 3. In 1988, the Secretary of State for the Environment announced that the PSA would in future operate on a commercial basis. This is to say that its income, and indeed its survival, would depend on gaining work from government departments in the face of private sector competition. To facilitate this, the PSA was restructured into a number of separate business functions. In addition, in order to promote a more commercial orientation, a Business Development Directorate was established within the PSA. The consultants Price Waterhouse were appointed to operate alongside the new Directorate to assist the PSA’s commercial development by, among other things, training staff in business accounting, financial management, business planning, people management, customer care and marketing. Stage 4. In September 1989, the government announced that the PSA was to be privatised. In June 1990, the legislation necessary to enable this to take place was passed. Stage 5. In October 1990, in preparation for privatisation, the PSA was restructured into three main businesses: PSA Projects, PSA Building Management (which was eventually split into five separate companies), and PSA International (which, in the end, was closed down rather than sold). Stage 6. PSA Projects was privatised in 1992. This was followed in 1993 by the sale of the five companies which comprised PSA Building Management. Organisational change in the public sector 103 The above presents the privatisation of the PSA as a relatively straightforward and well-planned process. However, this is far from the reality of what happened. First, it must be recognised that most of the above actions were imposed on the PSA rather than arising from the decisions of its own management. Second, the six stages focused very much on changes to structures and procedures whilst paying little attention to the need for attitudinal, behavioural and cultural changes or, indeed, the reaction of the PSA’s staff to the notion of privatisation. Finally, as the following will explain, the move to privatise the PSA was far slower and much messier than either the government or the PSA’s management had allowed for. The pace of privatisation As the following quotation from a director of one of the privatised companies indicates, the privatisation of the PSA took longer, and was more difficult, than expected: The privatisation process was a very lengthy process. It was much longer than it was originally intended to be and meant that the natural unease and nervousness that occurs during such periods was prolonged. IJPSM 14,2 104 The main reasons for this slowness were twofold. Lack of strategic direction. At first, the PSA’s Board appeared to treat privatisation as a standard public sector change programme which could be planned in advance, executed in a straightforward way with few unforeseen problems, and which staff would accept, even if they did not like it. However, this proved to be far from the case. The PSA’s Board brought in a firm of consultants to help them to clarify the PSA’s strategic direction but, as this remark by PSA’s then Deputy Chief Executive demonstrates, the result seemed somewhat unfocused: For example, we did a lot of work on objectives. I don’t think I can remember what we boiled it down to in the end, F F F something like: to preserve the maximum number of viable longterm jobs. Whatever the merits or not of the work the Board did, the middle and lower reaches of the PSA seemed more alarmed than consoled by developments. It was also the case that even where positive decisions were taken by the top, such as a commitment to provide retraining and outplacement support for staff, they found it difficult to put them into practice. One former PSA Director stated that: There were a few things like that [the training] where I think the best intentions at the top were weakened by people underneath, and I didn’t know why. The difficulties faced by top management in developing a new strategy for the PSA and in pushing forward the pace of privatisation were threefold. The first was that though, as civil servants, they had been brought up in a stable environment which operated by well-understood rules, they found themselves having to transform the organisation into a commercial entity that could be successful whilst not understanding the nature of competition nor ever feeling in control of the pace of change. The second was that, having been used to running a bureaucratic organisation with compliant staff, they found themselves attempting to construct a more flexible and entrepreneurial body with an increasingly disgruntled and worried workforce. The last was that, their actions were being dictated and judged by their political masters, whose sole concern appeared to be to privatise the PSA as quickly as possible, no matter what it cost or who was offended. Therefore, senior managers found themselves caught between the politicians’ desire for speed and their staff’s desire for job security, both of which clashed with their own cautious and ruledriven approach to change. Resistance by PSA employees. This was the second main reason for the slowness of the privatisation process. The majority of PSA employees did not want their organisation privatised. Not only did they value the stability and certainty that working for a government body gave them, but also most believed that the PSA had little chance of survival in the private sector. As one of their trade union officials put it: The implications of privatisation for staff, in respect of pensions, severance terms, general pay and conditions, were enormous. What happens if the organisation who took them over went bust at some later date? The result of this uncertainty and fear for their future was that staff sought to resist and delay privatisation. On an individual basis, many staff resisted by withholding information and slowing down the process wherever possible. For example, some staff basically gave up work and devoted all their time to searching for another job, whilst others fabricated rumours. There was also a general increase in union militancy. On a collective basis, the PSA staff trade union decided to oppose the privatisation. As one union official commented: F F F we felt and still feel that if you are providing a service for the public sector and using taxpayers’ money, that it’s quite inappropriate to have this work carried out by organisations making a profit. Organisational change in the public sector 105 The official also went on to state that it was union policy to delay the privatisation: F F F the idea was that the longer it took, the longer people were in the public sector. There were issues about information, about negotiation over what the implications of the sale would be for staff, and obviously, from that point of view, the idea of slowing the process down wasn’t one that we were objecting to. Eventually this resistance became overt and staff took industrial action, including working to rule and strikes. In a belated attempt to defuse staff opposition to privatisation, the government devised a staff choice scheme whereby PSA staff could choose to transfer fully to the privatised companies, to be seconded to them for a limited period, or to take early retirement. The staff choice scheme also protected employees’ pension entitlements. Though this defused some of the opposition, it was not until after the 1992 General Election, when many people  ± mistakenly as it turned out  ± expected a change of government, that staff finally accepted the inevitability of privatisation. As can be seen, the PSA’s privatisation was characterised overall by uncertainty, delay and a lack of any clear strategic direction (other than to privatise it). The entire process was driven by one unquestionable aim: privatisation. The process, cost and consequences of privatisation were all subordinate, and, in some senses, irrelevant to achieving that one aim. Though clear in itself, the aim provided no guidance as to how it was to be achieved nor, importantly, did it offer any direction for what was to take place afterwards. As for the PSA’s strategy, instead of clarity and purpose, what developed was a stream of unplanned, ad hoc and muddled decisions made in reaction to events, rather than in anticipation of them. Discussion Though it is not the purpose of this article to evaluate the merits or otherwise of the decision to privatise the PSA, it is important to recognise that the wave of privatisation seen in the UK in the 1980s and 1990s was essentially based on a IJPSM 14,2 106 political belief that the private sector, driven by competitive pressures, was far better at delivering value-for-money services than the public sector (Crouch and Streeck, 1997; Ferlie et al. , 1996; Flynn, 1993). Consequently, the privatisation of the PSA, like other privatisations, was not driven by some form of rationaleconomic decision-making process, but by a political agenda aimed at transferring parts of the public sector to the private sector. Consequently, successive governments were less concerned with the process of change, or indeed its cost, than with ensuring that the transfer took place. It is not surprising, then, that the PSA’s staff should have felt resentment and a sense of betrayal that, after many years of public service, their careers and livelihoods were threatened by what appeared to them to be ideological dogma. This put the senior managers of the PSA in a situation for which they were ill-prepared and had little experience. They had to plan for, and get staff to comply with, a proposition for which they themselves seemed to have little sympathy and over which, in the final analysis, they felt they had little control. To achieve privatisation, they attempted to apply the sort of rational-planned approach to change which had worked for them when undertaking change in the past. But past changes had been undertaken within a relatively stable public sector environment, with a compliant workforce and with few potential losers. Unfortunately, the government’s policy in this instance was driven by mainly ideology rather than rationality. It was designed to remove the PSA from the public sector, the workforce were afraid and hostile, rather than compliant, and there were a great number of potential losers. It was also the case that the senior echelons of the PSA appeared themselves to be apprehensive and lacking in support for the privatisation. Therefore, not surprisingly, senior managers found it difficult to devise and put their plans into practice when faced with an uncertain environment and a hostile staff. As time passed, three factors came to the fore which ensured that privatisation was completed: (1) In order to achieve its objective of privatising the PSA, the government eventually recognised it would need to be pragmatic as to how this was achieved and its cost. (2) The PSA management abandoned its planned approach to change and, basically, adopted a reactive and ad hoc approach to overcoming the barriers to privatisation  ± dealing with them as they arose and being prepared to be flexible in most aspects of the process. 3) After the 1992 General Election produced no change of government or policy, it became clear to staff that the privatisation of the PSA was inevitable. As can be seen, in terms of strategic change, this was an instance where there was a clear, though limited, objective, but no clear or consistent strategy for achieving it. It is highly debatable whether or not the privatisation of the PSA has produced any measurable benefits to the UK taxpayer. Certainly the g overnment’s own National Audit Commission (NAO, 1995; 1996) was critical of the cost and process of the PSA’s privatisation. Also, whilst most organisations in the private sector appear convinced that closer, less hostile and longer-term working relationships between customers and suppliers are the way to achieve best value for money, this does not seem to be the case in terms of the public sector’s relations with the privatised PSA or other companies in the construction industry (Burnes and Coram, 1999). As far as change management was concerned, what we can see is that the PSA’s managers attempted to apply the sort of quick, top-down, mechanistic approach to change which had previously worked well in the relatively stable world of the public sector. However, the PSA was moving into unknown territory, the private sector, which was far more dynamic and unpredictable than it was used to. Also, it needed to achieve two forms of change at the same time: changes to structures, practices and procedures; and changes to attitudes, behaviour and culture. Whilst the traditional top-down public sector approach might be suitable to the former, provided the environment was relatively stable, it was not suitable to the latter, regardless of the nature of the environment. This meant that the PSA’s leaders were attempting to take their staff into unknown territory, using an inappropriate approach and in a direction with which even they were apparently ill at ease. Conclusions As the literature review argued, there is no â€Å"one best way† to manage change. Just because an approach was deemed appropriate and worked over a period of time does not mean it will work in all situations or for all time (Burnes, 1996). A top-down, planned approach may well be suitable for a stable, public sector bureaucracy, but if a need arises to move the same bureaucracy into the private sector, the same approach is unlikely to work. As Dunphy and Stace (1993, p. 905) remarked: â€Å"Turbulent times demand different responses F F F† Although the privatisation of the PSA is now a past event, the nature of the public sector and whether further elements of it should be privatised, or required to become more market-orientated, still form part of the current political agenda in most countries. Consequently, the lessons of the PSA’s privatisation are still very relevant to those who make public policy and to those charged with carrying out the changes which such policies require of them. The main lessons are as follows. First, to prepare services for privatisation, or to operate on a more commercial basis, requires both structural and cultural change. As Allaire and Firsirotu (1984) showed, to achieve both requires different approaches with different timescales. A similar point was made by Beer and Nohria (2000), cited earlier, who call for a combination of Theory E and Theory O approaches to achieve such transformations. To focus on only one of these, as was the case with the PSA, is unlikely to achieve the benefits which policy makers expect, and taxpayers increasingly demand. Organisational change in the public sector 107 IJPSM 14,2 108 Second, there is a need to win over staff, or at the very least to address their concerns and fears. A key element in this is the need for policy makers to move beyond basing their decisions mainly on dogma or political creed, and instead, as O’Toole and Jordan (1995, p. 190) recommend, to base them upon â€Å"a rigorous identification of weaknesses and a considered plan to remedy those defects†. As far as the PSA case was concerned, there was never really any attempt to win over staff or, until quite late in the process, to address their fears and concerns. The main reason for this was that the PSA’s senior managers did not know how to promote a decision based on dogma, one which they had played no part in developing, and over whose consequences they had significant reservations. Third, it should also be noted that the PSA’s management themselves did not possess the skills or experience to manage such a change process. Although this was recognised by the provision of consultants to help with the more structural and technical changes, support for the more cultural aspects appears to have been ignored. Therefore, in conclusion, as can be seen, the PSA’s privatisation was flawed and, some might consider, ill-conceived in the first place. However, this should not blind us to the important lessons it offers both policy makers and practitioners when considering and managing organisational changes in the public sector. Policy makers rightly require and expect public sector employees to provide value for money. In turn, public sector employees have a right to expect policy makers to take decisions, and manage the consequences which flow from these, in such a way that it can be openly seen that value for money is their primary concern. References Allaire, Y. and Firsirotu, M. E. (1984), â€Å"Theories of organizational culture†, Organization Studies, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 193-226. Beer, M. and Nohria, N. (2000), â€Å"Cracking the code of change†, Harvard Business Review, May/June, pp. 133-41. Brindle, D. (1999), â€Å"Pensions computer upgrade hit by 1,900 bugs as deadline looms†, The Guardian, 26 January, p. 3. Buchanan, D. A. and Boddy, D. (1992), The Expertise of the Change Agent, Prentice-Hall, London. Buchanan, D. A. and Storey, J. (1997), â€Å"Role-taking and role-switching in organizational change: the four pluralities†, in McLoughlin, I. and Harris, M. Eds), Innovation, Organizational Change and Technology, International Thompson, London. Burnes, B. (1996), â€Å"No such thing as a `one best way’ to manage organisational change†, Management Decision, Vol. 34 No. 10, pp. 11-18. Burnes, B. (2000), Managing Change, 3rd ed. , Prentice-Hall, Harlow. Burnes, B. and Coram, R . (1999), â€Å"Barriers to partnership in the public sector: the case of the UK construction industry†, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 43-50. Burnes, B. and Salauroo, M. (1995), â€Å"The impact of new customer-supplier relationships on mergers within the NHS†, Journal of Management in Medicine, Vol. No. 2, pp. 14-29. Chapman, L. (1978), Your Disobedient Servant, Chatto Windus, London. Collins, D. (1998), Organizational Change, Routledge, London. Crouch, C. and Streeck, W. (Eds) (1997), Political Economy of Modern Capitalism, Sage, London. Cummings, T. G. and Worley, C. G. (1997), Organization Development and Change, 6th ed. , South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH. Dawson, P. (1994), Organizational Change: A Processual Approach, Paul Chapman Publishing, London. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds) (1998), Strategies for Qualitative Enquiry, Sage, London. Dunphy, D. D. and Stace, D. A. 1992), Under New Management: Australian Organizations in T ransition, McGraw-Hill, Roseville. Dunphy, D. D. and Stace, D. A. (1993), â€Å"The strategic management of corporate change†, Human Relations, Vol. 46 No. 8, pp. 905-18. Ferlie, E. , Ashburner, L. , Fitzgerald, L. and Pettigrew, A. (1996), The New Public Sector in Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Flynn, N. (1993), Public Sector Management, Harvester-Wheatsheaf, London. Flynn, R. and Williams, G. (Eds) (1997), Contracting for Health, OUP, Oxford. French, W. L. and Bell, C. H. (1995), Organization Development, 5th ed. , Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Fulton, The Lord (1968), The Civil Service: Report of the Committee, Cmnd 3638, HMSO, London. Garvin, D. A. (1993), â€Å"Building a learning organization†, Harvard Business Review, July/August, pp. 78-91. Grundy, T. (1993), Managing Strategic Change, Kogan Page, London. Harris, P. R. (1985), Management in Transition, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Hatch, M. J. (1997), Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic and Postmodern Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Hendry, C. (1996), â€Å"Understanding and creating whole organizational change through learning theory†, Human Relations, Vol. 48 No. 5, pp. 621-41. Horton, S. 1996), â€Å"The Civil Service†, in Farnham, D. and Horton, S. (Eds), Managing the New Public Services, 2nd ed. , Macmillan, Basingstoke. Kanter, R. M. , Stein, B. A. and Jick, T. D. (1992), The Challenge of Organizational Change, Free Press, New York, NY. Kotter, J. P. (1996), Leading Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Lewin , K. (1947), â€Å"Frontiers in group dynamics†, in Cartwright, D. (Ed. ) (1952), Field Theory in Social Science, Social Science Paperbacks, London. Mabey, C. and Mayon-White, B. (1993), Managing Change, 2nd ed. , The Open University/ Paul Chapman Publishing, London. Miller, D. and Friesen, P. H. (1984), Organizations: A Quantum View, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. NAO (1995), Interim Report: PSA Services, The Sale of PSA Projects, Report by the National Audit Office, HMSO, London. NAO (1996), PSA Service: The Transfer of PSA Building Management to the Private Sector, Report by the National Audit Office, HMSO, London. Nonaka, I. (1988), â€Å"Creating organizational order out of chaos: self-renewal in Japanese firms†, Harvard Business Review, November-December, pp. 96-104. O’Toole, B. J. and Jordan, G. (Eds) (1995), Next Steps: Improving Management in Government, Dartmouth, Aldershot. Peters, T. 1989), Thriving on Chaos, Pan, London. Pettigrew, A. M. (1985), The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change at ICI, Blackwell, Oxford. Organisational change in the public sector 109 IJPSM 14,2 110 Pettigrew, A. M. , Ferlie, E. and McKee, L. (1992), Shaping Strategic Change, Sage, London. Pfeffer, J. (1981), Power in Organizations, Pitman, Cambridge, MA. Pfeffer, J. (1992), Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Plowdon, The Lord (1961), Control of Public Expenditure, Cmnd 1432, HMSO, London. PSA (1988), PSA Annual Report 1987-88, HMSO, London. Robson, C. 1993), Real World Research, Blackwell, Oxford. Salauroo, M. and Burnes, B. (1998), â€Å"The impact of a market system on the public sector: a study of organisational change in the NHS†, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 451-67. Schein, E. H. (1985), Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Senior, B. (1997), Organisational Change, Pitman, London. Smith, S. (Ed. ) (1997), Create That Change! , Kogan Page, London. Stace, D. A. and Dunphy, D. D. (1994), Beyond the Boundaries: Leading and Re-creating the Successful Enterprise, McGraw-Hill, Sydney. Stacey, R. (1993), Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics, Pitman, London. Stickland, F. (1998), The Dynamics of Change: Insights into Organisational Transition from the Natural World, Routledge, London. Storey, J. (1992), Developments in the Management of Human Resources, Blackwell, Oxford. Wilson, D. C. (1992), A Strategy of Change, Routledge, London. Wooten, K. C. and White, L. P. (1999), â€Å"Linking OD’s philosophy with justice theory: postmodern implications†, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 7-20. Yin, R. K. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, London. How to cite Managing Organisational Change, Papers

Islam and Business free essay sample

Relationships are important to business either making or breaking a deal. Of one such example: In United States we see the shaking of hands as closing, solidifying, and making a deal. However, the Jewish culture has a tradition of gender in shaking hands. Men and women are not to touch unless they are betrothed to each other. This could become complex and minimize business transactions. Also, when we consider Islam it would be remiss to consider doing business during their month of Ramadan. This is a time of fasting with. their business hours greatly reduced. Cultural factors can sometimes raise the cost of doing business, in China, guanxi is a cultural reality, that is necessary for business relationships in Chinese culture, the great McDonalds corporation, had to pay dearly because it lacked the concept of Guanxi. 2. Do you think that business practices in an Islamic country are likely to differ from business practices in the United States? If so, how? I Do you think that business practices in an Islamic country are likely to differ from business practices in the United States. With some seemingly practical similarities in Islam to the U. S. ooking deeper we find much difference. Let’s look again at hand shaking. In the U. S. we shake hands differently by occasion and gender. We have many a stratum to hand shaking. If men in U. S. shake hands it’s a cultural rhythm of up and down with firm grip. In the Arabic and Islamic countries it may be considered rude to shake with a firm grip as their hand shake is somewhat weak in contact. Islamic’ also base their business transactions on relationships. They tend not to separate their business and personal relationships. Business relationships are built on trust, family ties, and honor. Our western culture is establishing individualism basing ones business associations on accomplishments creating loose business ties. A major difference between the two nations would be communication in language In order for successful business there must be learned and understanding of each language for business efforts to succeed. In the reading, an illustration of the cultural differences to time was given to explain the western business approach to time, and a society where the group dynamic dominates, folkways and mores. Such as the Arabic culture. . What are the implications for international business of differences in the dominant religion or ethical system of a country? Relationships are affected by dominate religion differences. Differences in religion require inter-cultural sensitivity. Things like knowing the holidays in ones religion that are kept, and understating the differences of interpersonal relationships how non believers and those that have strong beliefs may be tr eated differently in different nations. Religious differences can really have different play factors in business. Attitudes differ greatly when it comes to religion. Work ethics, when I think of China they have seemed to always have a rigorous learning practice. Yet, in ethics there has been corruption dealing with family members protecting family even when they know one of their members has broken an ethical standard. Western cultural still rests on individualism. The citizens of the United States will have caution but will decide with the law in signs of illegal practices even when it comes to turning a family member over to authorities. Cross Cultural Literacy, which means, an understanding of how cultural differences across and within nations can affect the way business is practiced 4. Choose two countries that appear to be culturally diverse. Compare the cultures of those countries and then indicate how cultural differences influence (a) the costs of doing business in each country, (b) the likely future economic development of that country, and (c) business practices. The United States and India, are two culturally diverse countries, one the United States, is described as not as rigid as India as it relates to degree of mobility, between social strata, in addition, the United States is described as a class system and India a caste system, in a caste system, that is the caste that you must remain in, in the United States, upward mobility is a possibility, it was said that in India things are changing for the Untouchables of India, The Dalit, who, are now being allowed to move into the urban areas, for better jobs and opportunities that were illegal for them until, the 70s and the 80s. . Can you see anything in the value of Islam that is hostile to business? a. The ritual nature of everyday life in a Muslim culture is striking to western vistors, Prayers 5 times a day, business meetings may be put on hold while Muslims engage in their daily prayer ritual. Women must be dressed in a certain manner. What does the experience of the region around Kayser i teach us about the realationship between Islam and business? b. The Anatolian tiger –many dismiss this poor largely agricultural region of Turkey as a non- European back water, it is a region where traditional Islamic values hold sway. Merchant honor- 91% of a Muslims life is devoted to work in order to put food on the table. Islamic Calvinism is a fusion of traditional Islamic values and work ethic often associated with Calvinism. Islam preaches equal opportunity in business. Globalization is at work. The weakness in the Islamic model is traditional attitudes toward women in the work place. . Given the Islamic Proclivity to favor market based systems, Muslims countries are likely to be receptive to international business as long as those businesses behave in a manner consistent with Islamic ethics. 6. Why do you think that it is so important to cultivate guanxi and guanxiwang in China? a. Guanxinang- relationship network with the right guanxi, legal rule can be bent. What does the experience of DMG tells us about the way things work in Ch ina? What would likely happen to a business that obeyed all of the rules and regulations, rather than trying to find a way around them as Dan Mintz apparently did? b. Guanxi versus contract law in the west, in China personal power relationships or connections. What are the ethical issues that might arise when drawing upon guanixiwang to get Things done in China? What does this suggest about the limits of using guanixwang for a Western business committed to high ethical standards? c. There is a fine line between relationship building and bribery. Cross cultural literacy and understanding of how cultural differences across and within nations can affect the way business is practiced. References L Minder, â€Å"McDonalds to close original Bejing store USA Today Dec 2, 1996, P 1A Hannah Selugson â€Å"For American Markets Workers in China a cultural Clash, New York Times, Dec 24, 2009 P B1 Cultural Differences , Iowa State University web site www. celtiastate. edu, March 25, 2010 All citations Global Business Today Charles W. L. Hill